Districts Created Between 1991 and 2001 in India
The period from 1991 to 2001 saw the creation of numerous new districts across India, driven by a mix of administrative reorganization, statehood aspirations, regional demands, and the need to decentralize governance. Here's an analysis of the trends during this period:
1. Decentralization and Administrative Reorganization
Chhattisgarh (1998):
Nine districts, including Dantewada, Dhamtari, Janjgir-Champa, Jashpur, Kanker, and Korba, were carved out to improve administrative efficiency in the newly formed state. This reorganization addressed governance needs in remote and tribal-dominated regions.
Delhi (1997):
The national capital was divided into nine districts—Central, East, New Delhi, North, North East, North West, South, South West, and West—to improve governance and urban management in one of the fastest-growing cities in the world.
Odisha (1993-1994):
Odisha underwent major reorganization, creating 15 new districts, such as Malkangiri, Rayagada, Kendrapara, and Jagatsinghapur, to cater to tribal, rural, and coastal regions.
2. Addressing Regional Aspirations and Tribal Representation
Arunachal Pradesh (1992-1994):
New districts like Papum Pare, Upper Siang, and Tawang were created to meet governance needs in remote and tribal-dominated areas.
Jharkhand (1991-1994):
Districts like Bokaro, Chatra, Garhwa, and Kodarma were created to address tribal and regional aspirations in the area that later became Jharkhand in 2000.
Mizoram (1997-1998):
The creation of districts such as Champhai, Kolasib, Lawngtlai, and Saiha reflects the focus on better governance for tribal regions in the Northeast.
3. Urbanization and Administrative Demands
Gujarat (1997):
Districts like Anand, Dohad, Navsari, and Porbandar were carved out to improve administrative focus in regions experiencing urban and industrial growth.
Maharashtra (1998-1999):
Urban and semi-urban districts like Nandurbar, Washim, Gondiya, and Hingoli were created to manage growing populations and administrative challenges.
Uttar Pradesh (1994-1998):
The state created numerous districts like Kushinagar, Ambedkar Nagar, Baghpat, and Gautam Buddha Nagar to address the governance needs of its growing urban and semi-urban population.
4. Managing Population Growth and Historical Splits
Tamil Nadu (1991-1997):
Districts like Nagapattinam, Viluppuram, Karur, and Theni were created to address regional disparities and manage population growth.
West Bengal (1992):
The bifurcation of West Dinajpur into Dakshin Dinajpur and Uttar Dinajpur reflects the need to manage population and improve administrative efficiency.
Here is the dashboard to explore these changes
Districts created between 2001-2011
Between 2001-2011, the number of districts increased from 593 to 640
1. Administrative Splits in Remote and Tribal Areas
Arunachal Pradesh (2001-2004):
Districts like Kurung Kumey, Lower Dibang Valley, and Anjaw were carved out of existing districts such as Lower Subansiri and Lohit, targeting administrative reorganization in geographically remote and tribal regions.
Chhattisgarh (2007):
Three districts—Bijapur, Dakshin Bastar Dantewada, and Narayanpur—were created from larger districts in the tribal-dominated Bastar region.
Jharkhand (2001-2007):
Six new districts, including Jamtara, Latehar, Saraikela-kharsawan, Simdega, Khunti, and Ramgarh, were created from existing districts, indicating a focus on improving governance in rural and tribal areas.
2. Growth of Urban and Semi-Urban Districts
Delhi (2006):
Nine new districts, including Central, East, New Delhi, and North East, reflect the continued urban expansion and administrative restructuring in India’s capital.
Tamil Nadu (2004-2009):
Krishnagiri (from Dharmapuri) and Tiruppur (from Erode and Coimbatore) were established, likely to address growing administrative demands in rapidly urbanizing areas.
Karnataka (2007-2009):
Districts like Chikkaballapura, Ramanagara, and Yadgir were created, suggesting adjustments to administrative setups in developing regions.
3. Political and Regional Realignments
Punjab (2006):
New districts such as Barnala, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, and Tarn Taran were created from larger districts, indicating a regional restructuring for political or administrative reasons.
Nagaland (2004):
The division of Tuensang led to the creation of Kiphire, Longleng, and Peren, suggesting efforts to reorganize governance in smaller tribal-dominated areas.
4. Focus on Historical and Population-Based Splits
West Bengal (2002):
The bifurcation of Medinipur into Paschim Medinipur and Purba Medinipur suggests reorganization to manage population distribution and administrative efficiency.
Rajasthan (2008):
Pratapgarh was carved out of Chittaurgarh, likely addressing population pressures and governance needs in the region.
Madhya Pradesh (2003):
Six new districts, including Alirajpur, Annupur, Ashoknagar, and Singrauli, were created from larger districts, indicating population redistribution or administrative balancing.
Comments